Quick disclosure before anything else: I haven't had a HONOR 600 in my own hand. This isn't a unit-on-loan review. What it is — the thing I actually wanted when I went looking and couldn't find — is a straight answer to the only question a buyer asks. At ₱28,999, is this worth your money, and who is it not for? To get there I read through what the people who did test it found, and I'll tell you where I land on the two things they keep arguing about.
So let's start with the part everyone agrees on, because it's genuinely the good part.
The fundamentals are excellent, and that's not nothing
The HONOR 600 packs a 7,000mAh battery, and across every review I read this was the headline — the word that kept coming up was "days," not "a day." YugaTech clocked 41 hours and 28 minutes in their video-loop test and over 18 hours in PCMark's work benchmark. Gadget Pilipinas landed near 17 hours on the same PCMark test. Different methods, same conclusion: this thing does not die on you. For a lot of people that single fact is the whole decision, and I won't pretend it isn't a real one.
The screen backs it up — a 6.57-inch AMOLED, 120Hz, with HONOR quoting a frankly silly 8,000 nits of peak brightness. Peak brightness numbers are mostly marketing theater (it's a momentary HDR figure, not what you stare at all day), but the reviewers who took it outdoors said the same thing: it stays readable in direct sun. That's the part that matters in Manila, where "can I see my screen at noon" is a real spec.
Charging is 80W wired, which fills it in roughly an hour and a half. That's a touch slow for that wattage given how often you'll not need to charge it, but it's a fine trade. Build quality jumped too — an aluminum frame this year, IP68/IP69/IP69K ratings, and it's still only 7.8mm thick and around 190 grams. None of this is exciting. All of it is the stuff you live with daily, and HONOR got it right.
The design: a very nice phone with no face of its own
Here's where I stop nodding along.
Every review opens by noting the HONOR 600 looks like an iPhone 17 Pro — the camera island, the flat rails, especially the orange colorway. Some reviewers shrugged it off as a non-issue, and a couple even framed it as a plus, a kind of quiet-luxury borrowed glow. I don't buy it. Gadget Pilipinas put it best when they said the design "works against its identity," and that's exactly my problem with it. At ₱28,999 you're not buying a cheap phone. You're buying an upper-midrange phone that decided the safest thing to look like was something else.
I want to be fair about the counter-argument, because there is one. HONOR isn't a stranger to orange — the X9b wore it back in 2024, so this isn't pure mimicry. And copying what already sells is a low-risk business move; you don't lose money betting on a look people already like. I get all that. I just think "we didn't lose money on the design" is a low bar for a phone at this price, and a buyer is allowed to want a device that doesn't look like a tribute act. When you hand someone your phone, it should look like your phone.
The AI is the surprise — it's actually useful
I went in cynical about the AI features, because "AI" on a spec sheet usually means a feature you'll try once and forget. The HONOR 600 mostly changed my mind, and the reviewers who used it agreed: this is the rare case where the AI earns its keep rather than padding the box.
The centerpiece is AI Image-to-Video 2.0, which turns a still photo into a short animated clip — and the upgrade this year is that you can write your own prompts to control the motion, instead of letting the phone guess. There's also a dedicated AI button on the side that you can map to the camera, a screenshot-summarizing tool, search, and a handful of agents. TeknoGadyet's line was that it's "not for gimmick only," and that tracks with everything else I read.
But here's the honest asterisk, and it's a real one. UnGeek made the sharpest observation of any review: the quality of what the AI produces depends heavily on how well you prompt it. Their team watched peers turn out genuinely impressive clips while their own attempts came out merely funny — same phone, different operator. So yes, the AI is substance. Just don't read "substance" as "automatic." It's a good tool that rewards the person willing to learn it, and quietly disappoints the person expecting magic. YugaTech also flagged that the camera leans on AI processing by default, which not everyone will want on all the time — fair, and worth a trip into the settings.
The thing that actually bugs me: no telephoto
If I had to name the one spec that should give a buyer pause, it's this. The HONOR 600 has a 200MP main camera and a 12MP ultrawide, and no dedicated telephoto/zoom camera at all.
What makes that sting isn't the omission in a vacuum — it's that HONOR's own HONOR 200 from 2024 had a telephoto, as YugaTech pointed out. They had the part, and they took it out. GSMArena was blunter, calling the missing zoom the phone's real weakness and noting that rivals around this price — the Xiaomi 15T Pro, the Oppo Reno15, the Galaxy S25 FE — ship a dedicated zoom lens. The main sensor is good enough that 2x crops hold up fine, and reviewers said hybrid zoom is "serviceable," but serviceable isn't the same as having the hardware. If you shoot a lot of zoomed shots, this is the line in the review that's for you.
A smaller gripe while I'm here: a few reviewers noted the speakers distort at max volume, with harsh sibilance once you push past the boost. Not a dealbreaker, but don't buy this expecting a great movie speaker.
So — is it worth ₱28,999?
For most people, honestly, yes. If your priorities are a battery that won't quit, a bright sharp screen, fast-enough charging, software that's supported for six years, and AI tools you're actually willing to learn, the HONOR 600 delivers all of that and feels more premium than its price. The launch promos even dipped the entry price toward ~₱26k, which sweetens it further. (Pricing has been creeping up across the board this year, partly due to the ongoing RAM-supply crunch that Gadget Pilipinas flagged, so a phone holding the line near ₱28,999 isn't nothing.)
It's not for you if you lean on zoom photography, or if you want a phone with a design that's its own. Those are the two real catches, and neither is hidden — they're just things HONOR would rather you not weigh too hard.
One more fork before you decide: if the missing telephoto and the lack of wireless charging are your two objections, the HONOR 600 Pro answers both — it adds the telephoto, wireless charging, and a faster chip. It also costs ₱49,999. That's ₱21,000 more for the parts HONOR cut out of this one, which is its own kind of answer about what the standard 600 is.
A phone that nails everything you touch daily and borrows the one thing you show off. I can live with that trade at this price. I just wish I didn't have to explain whose phone it looks like every time I pulled it out.
Sources
Reviews referenced:
- YugaTech — HONOR 600 Review — battery/charging tests, camera, AI-on-by-default note, missing telephoto vs. HONOR 200
- Unbox.ph — HONOR 600 Series Review: More than just AI Gimmicks? — AI verdict, price, build
- Walastech — HONOR 600 Review: Beyond Familiar — design, charging (0–50% in 30 min), HONOR orange precedent (X9b)
- Gadget Pilipinas — HONOR 600 Review — "works against its identity" design line, no wireless charging as main disappointment, RAM-crisis pricing note, ~17h PCMark
- TeknoGadyet — HONOR 600 5G Review — display, speaker distortion at 200%, 0–100% in ~1h08m
- GSMArena — Honor 600 review — telephoto as the real weakness, chipset vs. rivals, competitor list
- UnGeek — HONOR 600 5G Review — AI output "depends on how you prompt" caveat
- GadgetMatch — HONOR 600 Pro review — Pro specs for the closing comparison only
Official / corroboration:
